Nonbinary Encyclopedia — Post-Project Review

103 completed entries • 127,338 total words • Generated 2026-03-30 23:22

ⓘ  About the readability metrics — click to expand
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level 0–18+ • higher = harder

Estimates the US school grade level required to understand the text. Grade 8–10 is typical for mainstream non-fiction; above 16 is graduate-level. Combines average sentence length and average syllables per word.

Gunning Fog Index 0–20+ • higher = harder

Estimates years of formal education needed. A score of 12 is readable by a high-school senior; above 17 is considered difficult even for college graduates. Penalises long sentences and words with three or more syllables.

SMOG Index 0–18+ • higher = harder

Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Like Fog, it counts polysyllabic words but uses a simpler formula. Best applied to texts of 30+ sentences; tends to agree closely with FK Grade for academic prose.

Coleman-Liau Index 0–17+ • higher = harder

Unlike syllable-based metrics, Coleman-Liau uses character counts per word and sentence. Returns a US grade level. More stable across languages and OCR-processed texts; not sensitive to unusual long words with few syllables.

Automated Readability Index (ARI) 1–14+ • higher = harder

Uses character-to-word ratio and word-to-sentence ratio — no syllable counting needed. Returns a US grade level (1 = kindergarten, 14 = professor). Closely tracks FK Grade in practice.

Dale-Chall Score 4–10+ • higher = harder

Based on a list of ~3,000 familiar words known to most 4th graders. Words outside this list are counted as "difficult." A score below 5 is very easy; above 9 is college-level. More sensitive to vocabulary than sentence length.

Linsear Write 0–20+ • higher = harder

Originally designed for US Air Force technical manuals. Counts "easy" words (≤2 syllables) vs "hard" words (≥3 syllables). Returns a grade level estimate. Can be erratic on short texts.

Flesch Reading Ease 0–100 • higher = easier ⚠

The only metric here where a higher score means easier reading. Scores: 90–100 = very easy (children's books); 60–70 = standard prose; 30–50 = academic; below 30 = very difficult. All charts invert this axis so that up/outward always means harder to read.

Aggregated view — team-effort entries attributed to “team effort”

Project Completion

Custodian Workload

Custodian Output — Breadth vs. Depth

Each bubble is one custodian. Horizontal = number of entries done; vertical = average words per entry; bubble size = total word output. Reveals who wrote many shorter entries vs. fewer but longer ones.

Writing Style Fingerprint

Five metrics are averaged per custodian, then normalised 0–1 per metric across all custodians: the custodian with the lowest average on a metric scores 0; the highest scores 1. This makes the shape comparable across metrics with very different scales.
Flesch Reading Ease is inverted (relabelled “Flesch Ease (inv.)”) so that all five axes point outward = harder/more complex: a wide polygon means the author tends toward longer, more complex prose; a narrower polygon indicates shorter, more accessible writing.

Entry Summary

Must-Have vs Optional: Word Count

Did the team write more for must-have entries? Each point is one entry; box shows median & IQR.

Length vs. Readability

Use the dropdown (top-left of chart) to switch readability metric on the y-axis. All metrics: higher y = harder to read. Flesch Reading Ease is axis-inverted so it follows the same convention.

Readability Distribution by Custodian

Use the dropdown to switch metric. Box shows median/IQR; points show individual entries. All metrics: higher y = harder to read.

Hardest and Easiest Entries

Top 10 hardest (left) and top 10 easiest (right) completed entries by Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Colour = custodian.

All Readability Metrics — Parallel Coordinates

Each line is one entry, coloured by custodian. Drag a range on any axis to filter entries; click the axis label to sort. All axes: top = harder/more complex. Flesch Reading Ease axis is inverted so top = hardest, consistent with all other axes. Metrics:

All Entries by Length

Entry Length Distribution

Histogram showing how entry lengths are distributed per custodian. Reveals whether entries cluster tightly or span a wide range.

Front Matter & Supporting Sections

Word counts for Dedication, Preface, Reader’s Note, Introduction, and Bibliography Introduction — the meta-work surrounding the main encyclopedia entries. Colour = custodian.

Readability Metric Correlations

Pearson r between pairs of readability metrics (lower triangle). Red = positive correlation, blue = negative.

Sentence Complexity

Average sentence length vs. percentage of difficult words. Longer sentences with more difficult words sit top-right.

Entry Readability Heatmap

All metrics Z-scored per column so colours are comparable across scales. Red = harder / longer, blue = easier / shorter. Entries sorted by Flesch-Kincaid grade (hardest at top).